This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Texas Recreational Road 255

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Recreational Road 255 marker

Recreational Road 255
Lua error in Module:Infobox_road/map at line 16: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
Route information
Length: 56.596 mi[1] (91.082 km)
Existed: April 15, 1970 (1970-04-15)[1] – present
Major junctions
West end: US 69 near Colmesneil
  US 96 near Rayburn Country
East end: FM 692 in South Toledo Bend
Location
Counties: Tyler, Jasper, Newton
Highway system
RE 11 RE 2

Recreational Road 255 (RE 255) is a Recreational Road located in Tyler, Jasper, and Newton counties, in the southeastern region of the U.S. state of Texas. The highway is approximately 56.6 miles (91.1 km) long, and travels through mainly rural areas in the northern portion of the three counties. RE 255 begins at an intersection with U.S. Route 69 (US 69), in Tyler County, near the city of Colmesneil. The route travels through rural farmland in northern Tyler County, and crosses the Neches River into Jasper County. The roadway intersects State Highway 63 (TX 63) and US 96, and helps form part of the Sam Rayburn Dam. The route continues into Newton County, intersecting TX 87, before terminating at an intersection with Farm to Market Road 692 (FM 692), near the Louisiana border. RE 255 helps provide access to Angelina National Forest, the Sam Rayburn Reservoir, and the Toledo Bend Reservoir, which give the highway its Recreational Road designation.[2]

Recreational Road 255 began as Farm to Market Road 255, with the first section of the route being designated in 1945. Throughout the 1950s and the 1960s, FM 255 was extended several times, with the final extension being made in early 1970. The first stretch of RE 255 was designated in 1970 by Minute Order 063535, creating the first Recreational Road. The highway was extended three more times in the 1970s, completely replacing FM 255. FM 255 had a short spur that was designated in 1970, and was transferred over to RE 255 in 1974 when the main route was replaced. RE 255 Spur was cancelled in 1979.

Route description

Tyler County

Recreational Road 255 begins at its western terminus at an intersection with U.S. Route 69 as a two-lane, paved road. The highway proceeds eastward through mainly rural areas, passing several small farms. The roadway continues, intersecting County Route 3251 (CR 3251) and turning northeast. The road proceeds northeast before slowly bending east again and continuing. It proceeds through the small community of Oak Grove and turns northeasterly.[3] RE 255 continues, passing several homes and the small Gregory Cemetery as well as intersecting several county roads and slowly bending east. The route continues easterly, passing through a large forest and intersecting CR 3725 before crossing the Neches River and exiting Tyler County.[4][5]

Jasper County

File:Rayburn Dam1.jpg
The Sam Rayburn Dam, with RE 255 in front of it

After crossing the Neches River, RE 255 enters Jasper County and proceeds easterly. After a short distance, it crosses over a small relief creek for the Neches River and continues through heavily forested rural areas before turning slightly southeast. The route proceeds over a small creek before slowly bending northeastward. The roadway turns northerly and passes the small community of Beans. While traveling through Beans, the road passes several small farms and houses. It also intersects several county roads, including the former RE 255 Spur, which is now CR 32.[4][5] The highway then enters Angelina National Forest.[6]

The entrance to Angelina National Forest. RE 255 passes through the southern portion of the forest


Recreational Road 255 continues slightly northeasterly, passing through mainly farmland before reaching its junction with SH 63. RE 255 continues northward, entering the community of Ebenezer and intersecting a few local roads in the community. The roadway proceeds east and passes the McGee Cemetery. RE 255 proceeds to the Angelina River at the Sam Rayburn Dam. The road bends northeastward, passing through the small Overlook Park and continuing northeast along the dam.[5][7] It turns southeast and continues along the dam.[3] The dam ends after approximately 1.5 miles (2.4 km) and the highway exits Angelina National Forest and enters Twin Dikes Park.[8] The roadway continues, taking a large bend southeast and intersecting several local roads that lead to the reservoir. The highway proceeds southeasterly, passing several small homes and businesses that make up a portion of the community of Sam Rayburn. RE 255 proceeds northeast for a short distance before shifting eastward through Rayburn Country and intersecting FM 1007. Turning southeast, the route passes the southern edge of the Rayburn Country golf resort before exiting the community of Sam Rayburn and reentering rural areas.[9] RE 255 shifts southeast and proceeds to an intersection with U.S. Route 96, a divided highway. The route bends northeasterly, intersecting CR 232 before proceeding out of Jasper County.[5][7]

Newton County

An aerial view of South Toledo Bend; RE 255 travels through the community

RE 255 enters Newton County traveling eastward. The highway proceeds eastward before bending northeasterly and entering dense forest. Continuing eastward, the road reaches an intersection with SH 87.[3] The route continues east, passing the Mitchell Cemetery.[7][10] The highway intersects a couple of county routes and turns east before crossing over a small cove on the Toledo Bend Reservoir. RE 255 the enters the community of South Toledo Bend. It travels parallel to the reservoir, passing several small neighborhoods before shifting eastward. RE 255 passes the Shady Oaks Marina and the Sam Forse Collins Recreational Area before reaching its eastern terminus at an at-grade intersection with FM 692.[5][11]

Traffic

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) publishes yearly reports of the highway's annual average daily traffic (AADT), with counts usually taken near intersections. In 2010, RE 255's highest traveled point was at the intersection with FM 1007, with a daily county of approximately 2,800 vehicles. The lowest traveled point along the highway is just east of the intersection with SH 87, with a daily county of approximately 550 vehicles. The most traveled point in Tyler County is at the intersection with US 69, with a daily count of 1,100 vehicles. The intersection with FM 1007 has the highest AADT counts in Jasper County, while the most densely traveled point in Newton County is near the intersection with FM 692, at a count of 880 vehicles.[12] These counts are somewhat higher than those of 2008, when the highest taken count, which was also at the FM 1007 intersection, was at just 2,200 vehicles. The least traveled point had a count of 510 vehicles.[13] At 56.596 miles (91.082 km) long, RE 255 is the longest highway in the TxDOT's Recreational Road system.[14] No portion of the highway is listed as part of the National Highway System (NHS),[15] a network of roads important to the country's economy, defense, and mobility.[16]

History

Farm to Market Road 255
Location: Colmesneil - South Toledo Bend
Length: 56.596 mi[8] (91.082 km)
Existed: June 12, 1945[1]–September 15, 1978[1]

The first portion of what would become RE 255 was designated on June 12, 1945 as the first stretch of Farm to Market Road 255 (FM 255). This route traveled from an intersection with SH 63 to Ferguson at a length of approximately 2.8 miles (4.5 km). On September 27, 1960, FM 255 was extended 4.4 miles (7.1 km) northeastward to the McGee Bend Dam on Lake Sam Rayburn. FM 255 was extended on June 15, 1961 along a road that traveled along the McGee Bend Dam to an intersection with US 96. This extension added approximately 8.3 miles (13.4 km) to the route.[17] In 1962, three small bridges were constructed in western Jasper County. These bridges still function along the modern route.[A 1] On October 1, 1963, FM 255 was extended approximately 0.8 miles (1.3 km) southeastward from SH 63.[17] In 1965, the current bridge over the Angelina River was constructed.[21] FM 2628 from US 69 east 4.4 miles and FM 3125 from SH 87 to FM 692 were combined with the route on February 15, 1970, adding 4.4 miles (7.1 km) and 11.3 miles (18.2 km) respectively to FM 255.[17]

On April 1, 1970, Recreational Road 255 was officially designated by TxDOT Minute Order 063535. The route was approved by the TxDOT's Administration Circle on April 15, 1970. RE 255 was the first route to be designated by the TxDOT as a Recreational Road.[14] RE 255 began as the portions of FM 255 traveling from approximately 4.8 miles (7.7 km) east of US 69 to Beans Place 2.7 miles west of SH 63 and from US 96 to SH 87. In 1971, the modern bridge crossing over the small Indian Creek, located in western Jasper County, was constructed.[22] In March 15, 1974, RE 255 was extended eastward approximately 2.7 miles (4.3 km) from Beans Place to SH 63, giving the highway a total length of approximately 29.3 miles (47.2 km).[1] In 1976, the current bridge crossing the small Rocky Creek in western Newton County was constructed.[23] In 1977, three of the route's current bridges were constructed. Two of the bridges cross over the Neches River and the other is a small bridge located in Newton County.[A 2] The final portions of FM 255 was transferred to RE 255 on September 15, 1978, adding approximately 27.9 miles (44.9 km) to RE 255.[1][17] In 1981, the last two current bridges along the route were constructed. Both are small bridges located in western Newton County.[A 3] Twelve years after being cancelled, FM 255 was redesignated to a short road in Webb County.[17] This route has since been cancelled and redesignated as Urban Road 255, which was cancelled and added to SH 255.[29][30]

Future

Recreational Road 255 is located within the study area of the proposed Interstate 14, the Gulf Coast Strategic Highway. The current proposed routing of the Interstate would run along State Highway 63, to the south of RE 255, but no official routing has decided on.[31][32] A possible alternative routing of the highway would replace RE 255 as part of the interstate.[33]

Major junctions

County Location mi[8] km Destinations Notes
Tyler 0.000 0.000 US 69 (Wheeler Avenue) – Colmesneil Western terminus
Jasper Beans 16.503 26.559 CR 1002 Former RE 255 Spur
18.468 29.721 SH 63
Rayburn Country 27.939 44.963 FM 1007 (Rayburn Boulevard) Southern terminus of FM 1007
31.197 50.207 US 96 – Browndell, Jasper
Newton 45.794 73.698 SH 87 – Burkeville
South Toledo Bend 56.596 91.082 FM 692 Eastern terminus
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi

Spur route

Texas Spur 255.svg

Recreational Road 255 Spur
Location: Beans
Length: 0.700 mi[8] (1.127 km)
Existed: February 15, 1970–December 12, 1979[1]

Recreational Road 255 Spur (RE 255 Spur) was a short spur connection of FM 255 and later RE 255 that connected the small Beans community in Jasper County to RE 255. The spur was 0.700 miles (1.127 km) long.

RE 255 Spur began at an intersection with RE 255 near Beans Community, inside the southern edge of Angelina National Forest. The highway proceeded southeastward through rural areas, passing several small fields and houses. The roadway continued to its eastern terminus, a dead end point.[34][35]

RE 255 Spur was originally designated on February 15, 1970, as FM 255 Spur, on its present location. The spur was redesignated as RE 255 on March 15, 1974. The spur was cancelled and turned back to local maintenance on December 18, 1979.[1][17] The route has since been added to CR 1002.[8]

Major junctions

The entire highway was in Beans, Jasper County.

mi[8] km Destinations Notes
0.000 0.000 RE 255 Western terminus
0.700 1.127 Dead end Eastern terminus
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi

See also

References

Script error: No such module "Attached KML".

Notes
  1. These bridges were the Trout Creek Bridge,[18] the West Jordan Creek Bridge,[19] and the East Jordan Creek Bridge.[20]
  2. These bridges were the Neches River Bridge,[24] the Neches River Relief Bridge,[25] and the Primrose Slough Bridge.[26]
  3. These bridges were the Big Cow Creek Bridge and the Little Cow Creek Bridge.[27][28]
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.