Callaway, Nebraska

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Callaway, Nebraska
Village
Downtown Callaway
Downtown Callaway
Location of Callaway, Nebraska
Location of Callaway, Nebraska
Coordinates: Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Country United States
State Nebraska
County Custer
Area[1]
 • Total 0.70 sq mi (1.81 km2)
 • Land 0.70 sq mi (1.81 km2)
 • Water 0 sq mi (0 km2)
Elevation 2,549 ft (777 m)
Population (2010)[2]
 • Total 539
 • Estimate (2012[3]) 527
 • Density 770.0/sq mi (297.3/km2)
Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6)
 • Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5)
ZIP code 68825
Area code(s) 308
FIPS code 31-07660[4]
GNIS feature ID 0827856[5]

Callaway is a village in Custer County, Nebraska, United States. The population was 539 at the 2010 census.

History

Callaway was platted in 1885.[6] It was named for S. R. Callaway, general manager of the Union Pacific Railroad.[7]

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the village has a total area of 0.70 square miles (1.81 km2), all of it land.[1]

Demographics

Historical population
Census Pop.
1890 234
1900 406 73.5%
1910 765 88.4%
1920 833 8.9%
1930 833 0.0%
1940 768 −7.8%
1950 744 −3.1%
1960 603 −19.0%
1970 523 −13.3%
1980 579 10.7%
1990 539 −6.9%
2000 637 18.2%
2010 539 −15.4%
Est. 2014 526 [8] −2.4%
U.S. Decennial Census[9]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 539 people, 247 households, and 153 families residing in the village. The population density was 770.0 inhabitants per square mile (297.3/km2). There were 295 housing units at an average density of 421.4 per square mile (162.7/km2). The racial makeup of the village was 98.3% White, 0.2% Native American, 0.4% Asian, and 1.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.5% of the population.

There were 247 households of which 23.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 55.5% were married couples living together, 4.0% had a female householder with no husband present, 2.4% had a male householder with no wife present, and 38.1% were non-families. 33.6% of all households were made up of individuals and 22.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.18 and the average family size was 2.74.

The median age in the village was 47.8 years. 22.1% of residents were under the age of 18; 4% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 18.8% were from 25 to 44; 27% were from 45 to 64; and 28.2% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the village was 45.5% male and 54.5% female.

2000 census

As of the census[4] of 2000, there were 637 people, 262 households, and 166 families residing in the village. The population density was 916.8 people per square mile (356.4/km²). There were 291 housing units at an average density of 418.8 per square mile (162.8/km²). The racial makeup of the village was 97.49% White, 0.31% Native American, 0.31% Asian, 0.78% from other races, and 1.10% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.41% of the population.

There were 262 households out of which 25.2% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 57.6% were married couples living together, 5.7% had a female householder with no husband present, and 36.3% were non-families. 32.4% of all households were made up of individuals and 23.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.27 and the average family size was 2.87.

In the village the population was spread out with 22.8% under the age of 18, 4.9% from 18 to 24, 17.4% from 25 to 44, 24.5% from 45 to 64, and 30.5% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 48 years. For every 100 females there were 76.9 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 80.2 males.

As of 2000 the median income for a household in the village was $27,656, and the median income for a family was $37,000. Males had a median income of $24,188 versus $16,591 for females. The per capita income for the village was $14,673. About 7.2% of families and 14.6% of the population were below the poverty line, including 24.0% of those under age 18 and 12.0% of those age 65 or over.

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. A 1925 edition is available for download at University of Nebraska—Lincoln Digital Commons.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.